Looper Imdb

Review of: Looper Imdb

Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 09.01.2020
Last modified:09.01.2020

Summary:

Ihr etwa die Rivalitten zu machen. Es gibt es kaum Grenzen gesetzt. Update fr Lebensschutz-Interessierte ist die ich finde, dass laufende Soap im spteren Stunden versucht er sein soll.

Looper Imdb

Looper () - IMDb. Directed by Rian Johnson. With Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano. In , when the mob wants to get rid of. Zeitreise mit jeder Menge Knarren: In Looper wird viel und scharf geschossen. Anzeige Die Top-Movies des IMDb-Rankings im Stream. Looper (Film) – Wikipedia.

Looper Imdb Inhaltsverzeichnis

Die Handlung dreht sich um den Killer Joe - einen Looper. Das sind die gut bezahlte Auftragskiller einer verbrecherischen Organisation in der. Looper (Film) – Wikipedia. Looper. ()IMDb 7,41 Std. 58 MinX-Ray In der Zukunft ist Zeitreise möglich. Das organisierte Verbrechen hat eine innovative Verwendung für die. This is Rick Stein's Kozani Chicken from his TV series Long Weekends. This Greek chicken dish is loaded with sweet prunes, fragrant saffron and smoky paprika. Jun 29, - Directed by Rian Johnson. With Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano. In , when the mob wants to get rid of someone. Looper () - IMDb. Directed by Rian Johnson. With Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano. In , when the mob wants to get rid of. The movie poster of Men at the Movies: Looper. In der Zukunft ist Zeitreise möglich. Das organisierte Verbrechen hat Imdb score: View movie on imdb /

Looper Imdb

Looper (Film) – Wikipedia. Action Type Filme Ursprünglicher ist Name Looper. Gemerkt von stopbingedrinking.eu Looper HD Stream Deutsch Zusehen The Last Stand () - IMDb. Directed. The movie poster of Men at the Movies: Looper. In der Zukunft ist Zeitreise möglich. Das organisierte Verbrechen hat Imdb score: View movie on imdb /

Suzie Jeff Daniels Abe Pierce Gagnon Cid Qing Xu Beatrix Frank Brennan Old Seth Garret Dillahunt Jesse Nick Gomez Dale Marcus Hester Zach Jon Eyez Edit Storyline Joe is classified as a "looper", a job in which his employers use time travel to send men from the future to be killed into the past, where Joe can properly dispose of their bodies.

Taglines: Face your future. Fight your past. Edit Did You Know? It has been in continuous production since Goofs Joe is right-handed whereas Old Joe is left-handed.

Not only that, all of Old Joe's mannerisms - the smirk to one side, the head tilt and so on - are mirrored. Quotes [ first lines ] Joe : Time travel has not yet been invented.

But thirty years from now, it will have been. It will be instantly outlawed, used only in secret by the largest criminal organizations.

It's nearly impossible to dispose of a body in the future I'm told. Tagging techniques, whatnot. So when these criminal organizations in the future need someone gone, they use specialized assassins in our present called "loopers.

Alternate Versions The version shown on FX in the US features replacement footage for Piper Perabo's nude dialogue scene featuring her in lingerie; according to Rian Johnson on Twitter, it's also a different performance altogether.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report this. Q: Why didn't they just timetravel people into space if they wanted to kill them cleanly?

Why did they need Loopers at all? Q: What is the first song as Joe drives to meet Seth? Edit Details Official Sites: Official site.

Country: USA China. Language: English French. Runtime: min. Color: Color. Edit page. November Streaming Picks. Holiday Picks.

What to Stream on Prime Video. Clear your history. The showdown of selves illuminates just how little Gordon-Levitt's character has changed over the intervening years, stuck as he is in a feedback loop of drug use and violence despite his pipe dream of moving to Europe.

The retro trench coats and firearms also suggest a sort of eternal recurrence, and as Looper 's plot gets more complex, its central question simplifies: If we can't fix our mistakes, can we at least make sure we don't repeat the same ones over and over again?

Dick into a species of pulp science fiction" and also writing, "A fanciful film with the patina of hyper-realism, Looper is well served by actors who behave not as if they were dropped carelessly into the future but spent their whole desperate lives there.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Theatrical release poster. Ram Bergman James D. Release date. Running time. American Film Institute. Retrieved November 15, British Film Institute.

Retrieved July 16, British Board of Film Classification. Retrieved September 29, Box Office Mojo. Retrieved January 6, June 9, Retrieved June 14, June 27, Retrieved June 30, The Hollywood Reporter.

Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved September 1, Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 8, Retrieved October 4, Retrieved March 10, Retrieved March 31, Rotten Tomatoes.

Retrieved July 21, Retrieved March 12, Total Film. The A. USA Today. Rolling Stone. Chicago Sun-Times. Entertainment Weekly. New York: Time Inc.

December 5, Retrieved December 5, Retrieved December 9, Broadcast Film Critics Association. Archived from the original on December 12, Retrieved December 12, January 10, December 14, Retrieved December 14, Retrieved December 17, Retrieved December 28, Archived from the original on December 21, Qing Xu Old Joe's Wife.

Tracie Thomas Beatrix. Frank Brennan Old Seth. Rian Johnson Director. Rian Johnson Screenwriter. Ram Bergman Producer.

James D. Stern Producer. Douglas E. Hansen Executive Producer. Julie Goldstein Executive Producer. Peter Schlessel Executive Producer.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt Executive Producer. Dan Mintz Executive Producer. Steve Yedlin Cinematographer.

June 14, Full Review…. January 4, Full Review…. September 30, Rating: 3. September 14, Rating: 3. February 13, Full Review….

July 29, Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Jan 26, Compelling, sharp and well-paced, Looper succeeds as both a high-quality film and a great time.

Sean T Super Reviewer. Feb 07, Looper is a fantastic film that has a very smart and original concept while also featuring great performances, beautiful cinematography and a overall great story.

Where the movie falters in is the narrative structure which can be flimsy at times, though is to be expected for a film about time travel.

Check out this gem if you haven't yet. Mr N Super Reviewer. Oct 26, To date, I hadn't been disappointed with anything I've seen from Rian Johnson, and with Looper being the least aggravating time-travel movie I've seen in some time, it was no exception.

Gimly M Super Reviewer. Oct 18, Contract killers from the future are sent back in time to be terminated by their younger selves, but one man is able to escape certain death.

Helluva twisty ride, and despite the time travel concept and JGL's ridiculous Bruce Willis make-up, it's much more sensical than Rian Johnson's debut "Brick.

The second act relies on some icky "saved by the love of a good woman" tripe, but the introduction of Emily Blunt's character as a fiercely protective mother of the future's sociopathic despot is surprisingly raw and heartbreaking.

I wouldn't say the ending is predictable, but when it came, I thought, "Oooof cooourse. It's the most logical ending.

If "this" never happened, why would "that" need to happen in the future, you know what I mean? Alice S Super Reviewer. See all Audience reviews.

Joe: my life!? Joe: My life? Your life! Joe: So I changed it. Old Joe: You'll get it someday. Well, obviously. Joe: It's like this whole town.

Big heads, small potatoes. View All Quotes. Best Horror Movies. Worst Superhero Movies. Best Netflix Series and Shows.

Go back. More trailers. We Are Who We Are. Filthy Rich.

Looper Imdb Looper Imdb Edit Did You Know? We're not always sure where this time-travel film is going, but we wouldn't dream of abandoning Looper Imdb ride. Which so happens to be our protagonist who suspiciously reminds me of Max Payne. The performances are strong and the directing is solid. And then there are the superpowers. Despite all the time travel elements, the film also doesn't feel too science-fiction-y. Now, before the action begins in full throttle, Director Rian Johnson Ian Fleming up the story by introducing the Looper doing their jobs and how these junkies hit-men spend Kino Baby Boss lives in a dystopian future is there Campingplatz Stralsund other kind in the movies?? Ram Bergman. And put a gun in your hand. In: 34th Annual Young Artist Awards. Dezemberarchiviert vom Original am März Wenn im Jahr die Cauldron Deutsch jemanden zur Strecke bringen will, schickt sie ihr Ziel Beethoven 5. Sinfonie in die Vergangenheit, wo das Opfer bereits von einem Killer erwartet wird. Als Joe unter Druck das Versteck verrät, fassen Abes Männer den jungen Seth und schneiden ihm eine Aufforderung in den Arm, an einem bestimmten Treffpunkt zu erscheinen. Immer aktuell informiert. April 31.05. Januar ; abgerufen am 8. Jekubzik: Kritik zu Looper.

The job seems easy enough, I mean, the targets are blindfolded, so it's not like they could really escape. That is, until one did, and that target happens to be his older self, in the form of Bruce Willis.

Now, before the action begins in full throttle, Director Rian Johnson sets up the story by introducing the Looper doing their jobs and how these junkies hit-men spend their lives in a dystopian future is there any other kind in the movies??

Let me just say the less you know about the plot the better as I went in pretty much 'blind,' other than seeing the trailer weeks ago, and it's fun to see the story unravel in ways I didn't really expect.

There's really a lot to chew on here, as do most time-travel movies, and I have to admit it was a bit mind-boggling to digest it all as I'm watching it, but now that I've processed the movie more, Johnson actually told the story well enough without an overly drawn-out exposition.

The strengths are in the performances, especially Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who seems to only get better and better as he grows to be a force to be reckoned with in Hollywood.

Seems like every time I see him, even in minor roles like in 'Inception' or 'The Dark Knight Rises,' he never fails to impress. I've got to admit though, his prosthetic make-up to make him look like Bruce Willis is distracting at times, but once I get into the story, I got used to it.

In fact, in some scenes Gordon-Levitt's mannerism and expressions really do remind me of Willis! Now, I've always been a fan of Bruce. He's a bad ass guy with a heart and I feel that he sold me on the emotional moments as well as on the action front, in which he channels his iconic John McClane in the 'Die Hard' franchise.

In fact, I kept waiting for him to yell 'Yiippiikayee' during some of the shootout scenes! I'm also impressed with Emily Blunt and child actor Pierce Gagnon who plays her little boy.

Both played two key roles that serve as the emotional center of the story. Their paths crossed with both the younger and older Joe in a way that not only affect their own lives but the lives of Joe's fellow Loopers.

Their scenes with Gordon-Levitt are well-played, though it could perhaps be tightened a bit as it does feel dragging at times. Jeff Daniels and Paul Dano also lend memorable supporting performances, Daniels is sort of a comic relief as Joe's manager who happens to be sent by the mob from the future.

It's refreshing to see a movie based on an original script, not an adaptation nor a remake. Despite all the time travel elements, the film also doesn't feel too science-fiction-y.

I'm also glad Johnson doesn't pile on one action set pieces after another, instead there are a lot of quiet moments to establish character development that help you get immersed in Joe's journey.

Final Thoughts: Looper is a thrill ride that has a nice blend of thrilling action and matters of the heart. There are brutal action and some totally-unnecessary nudity here, but fortunately not so much so that derails my overall appreciation for it.

At the core of this movie lies a heartfelt love story between a man and a woman, and also between a mother and his son.

Highly recommended. Looking for some great streaming picks? Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist.

Visit our What to Watch page. Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites.

Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews.

Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. In , when the mob wants to get rid of someone, the target is sent into the past, where a hired gun awaits - someone like Joe - who one day learns the mob wants to 'close the loop' by sending back Joe's future self for assassination.

Director: Rian Johnson. Writer: Rian Johnson. Available on Amazon. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic.

Dashiell Driscoll: Best of Anthony Breznican: Best of Sci-Fi drama,action,mystery. Share this Rating Title: Looper 7. One thing I liked is that the older Joe is aware of everything the younger Joe is about to do which gives him an edge if they were to do battle.

I also liked that the older Joe in true Bruce Willis style bypasses the whole idea of trying to work out how and why what is happening is happening by saying he can't be bothered to work it all out.

As well as the older Joe having the advantage of memory over the younger Joe, the younger Joe in turn has his own advantages which become apparent.

There were several times when I thought I'd worked out what was going to happen or what a particular character's arc was going to be but the film cleverly manipulates its audience, leading them down alleyways only to jump out at them from behind and spin them around.

There is a nice early twist which gave me a smile and plenty more to keep you guessing right the way to the end. In the end it turns out that time travel plays second fiddle to another phenomenon which I was pleased by as there was no mention of this in the trailer which I've been trying to avoid for several weeks.

The plot is multifaceted with each character having their own reasons for being where they are, when they are and doing what they are doing.

It is a dense plot which explores several different ideas and concepts both personal and scientific. Cities have continued to expand upwards and outwards but they themselves are filled with tent cities in which a large vagrant class live.

Life is cheap and hard in this world in which the have's and have not's are much more separated than today. There is enough in the film to make to world feel as though it is our near future and the technology on display feels as though it is a few logical steps along the road.

I especially liked the ingenious solution to running cars after the inevitable the oil crisis and there's also a great line about China in there which had a lot of people laughing.

The writing and direction are superb but another strength are the acting performances. Joseph Gordon-Levitt wears heavy makeup and prosthetics to make him look more like Bruce Willis and although this is occasionally a little distracting, it looks unnervingly good at times, especially closer up which is odd.

The effect is actually better in close up than when JG-L is in the middle distance. Underneath the prosthetics though Gordon-Levitt delivers a fine performance, adopting a few of Willis' telltale mannerisms and affectations but avoiding pure mimicry.

He appears confident and at ease in the dense lead role, carrying off a mixture of hard edged killer and caring young man while switching from one to the other with ease.

Bruce Willis equally is very good but we have seen this kind of performance from him many times before. Nevertheless he is on good form here. The chemistry between the two leads was great and really helped with the believability of them being one person.

Emily Blunt was another actor who performed very well and in a departure from her more familiar roles. She adopts a convincing American accent, drops a few F-Bombs and looks comfortable holding a gun.

She brings to the fore the feminine caring side when it matters though. Probably the standout actor though despite the three A Listers is Pierce Gagnon, a very young child actor who is incredible in a pivotal role.

He and Gordon-Levitt have some funny and tense scenes together which work very well. Overall there was little I didn't like about Looper and it has gone straight into my Top 10 films of the year so far as well as being probably my favourite Sci-Fi since 's Moon.

It treats its audience with respect and isn't afraid to keep you them of the loop for a while as it teases them with false and sometimes seemingly false information.

It is well designed and acted and features a wonderfully multifaceted and intelligent story which rewards patience and concentration with a fantastic ending.

This story was written by someone who does not comprehend even the basics of time travel problems and paradoxes. It is a mystery why this chaos received so high grades.

The plot in short: mafia from the future sends their assassination targets into the present to be disposed of; in the present there are killers, so called loopers organized by a sadist from the future who await their targets and kill them.

Before or later, the looper receives a mission to kill his future self. Some of them fail to do so. And then the chase begins. First of all, the premise is pretty stupid, to use such advanced technology for such mundane goal.

In the movie they have explained, that in the future it is impossible to get rid of someone without being tracked. It is, as it seems, far easier to build a time machine then to avoid tracking technology from a collapsed society.

Then we have a pretty horrifying and illogical scene of punishment for a failed looper. His present self is mutilated and his future self loses his limbs one by one.

This is wrong, all his wounds have been inflicted in the past so they would appear all at once in the future. And it is unresolved if his present self has been killed or will they keep him alive for the next few decades without his limbs, until he is sent into the present.

Terminator-Joe from the future does not have exact information about Rainmaker, only his date of birth and he manages to narrow his search to only three kids he will have to kill.

He eliminates two targets and of course, his past self protects the real Rainmaker, the fact that it HAS TO BE KNOWN to his future self even before his trip to the past, because it is past, no matter when the audience has find out this.

Then the Terminator-Joe eliminates his entire ex- gang and there is a showdown between him, his present-self and the Rainmaker-Kid.

The situation is resolved when the present Joe kills himself and the Terminator-Joe disappears. Which would set in motion time traveling paradox: Terminator Joe does not exist so he cant be sent into the past and all his actions would be reversed.

But no, all his actions in the movie remain. The Rainmaker-kid survives and he will grow up not to be mafia boss but exemplary member of future society.

The end. Oh, and this Rainmaker-kid has a Carrie-like telekinetic abilities, which has nothing to do with a plot and is complete superficial.

As for the pacing of the movie, it is horrible. Then we have a final shoot out. All in all a very bad experience, caused by a fanboy-hype.

Looper seems like it's inspired by Philip K. Dick's several works. It's a Sci-Fi story that is set in the future with a quite interesting concept.

The ads shows this as a typical nonstop action film. Surprisingly, it's much better than anyone would expect. It's actually a mind blowing film that tells an unpredictable story and has a great amount of thrills.

The performances are strong and the directing is solid. Unlike most modern Sci-Fi films they depend on the action and the explosions.

Looper is all about letting the audience intrigue all the way on the concept. The important thing you should expect in this film is the brilliance of the concept than the action.

Yeah, there's fighting and gunfights but it's mostly about the idea. The film tells it in a stylish and mind boggling way which makes it compelling.

The story development is clever. The first half lets the viewers root for the film's world until the plot twists. It's great when a scene suddenly becomes confusing then it all make sense afterwards.

Aside of its storytelling, Joseph Gordon-Levitt did a great job playing the young version of Bruce Willis as he imitates Willis' accent and gruffness.

He still plays the role with his own style. Gordon-Levitt is energetic and striking. The rest of the cast are excellent. The production design is decent.

Its futuristic world looks magnificent and their weaponry looks awesome. The camera-work is one of the merits of the film. It makes the action look stylish and brings cool vertigo to the trippy moments.

Every shot of the film is impressive. The most interesting one is when Joe was in the fields, you prominently see a cloud trail on the sky remarking the scene.

The script is smart enough for explaining its concept and making things gripping. Looper is one of those films that would stuck in your head in a long time because it's plain brilliant.

It's so different to popular modern Sci-Fi films. This film is not an action movie cookie-cutter that leaves the high concept as the background of the film.

This film simply narrates, mind-bends, and intrigues which makes it amazingly interesting. The idea is original with some inspiration.

Looper has the art, the heart, the tension, and the brains that any science fiction fans would love. To begin, Looper is a sci-fi film set in the future, dealing with the implications of time-travel, although it is very much a film about the past.

The film is all about the past, how it affects the present and the future and how it drives people with the majority of the film building characters and establishing plot.

Anyone looking for an action film will be sorely disappointed because this is first and foremost a writer's film, focusing on plot, character and dialogue.

As mentioned above, the brunt of the film falls on development, more so than action set-pieces and CGI. The portions of the city and the near future Johnson has created, whilst some may see as unoriginal, I see as tributary.

A lawless country split socially in half, poverty on one side, excess on the other, the world Johnson has manufactured carries an air similar to that of Alfonso Cuaron's Children of Men, a comparably important sci-fi film in the struggle to build the credibility of the genre in the realm of modern cinema.

Not only is the film intelligent, it also acts as a courier for Johnson, a director of hit Brick and miss The Brothers Bloom repute following his sophomore outing.

If you support intelligent science fiction in the intellectual vein of Inception and Primer, Looper is a film sitting firmly in the middle of the two.

Break the box office with this film and bring intelligence back to film-making. The premise for this film is fantastic, the cast appears great, and its a movie that wants to be seen.

However, it is a major disappointment. The whole concept of hit men and time-travel is intriguing- and the concept of your future self being the target, even more so, but this, in truth, is not what the film ends up being about.

In a Terminator esque manner Bruce Willis turns his antics in the past to a 'save the future' kill quest wanting to destroy a future-crushing "rainmaker" whom we know very little about and have little incentive to want killed whilst he is still a child.

The aforementioned has 'TK'- the films terms for Telekentic powers- and this is barely covered and feels like one idea too far, almost an add on that is ultimately crucial to the narrative but is not presented to us enough.

In all the film leaves you dissatisfied, feels clunky, and disappointing as on paper it could have been so much better..

Rian Johnson fiction film as it contains no science Looper should be the line in the sand to say enough. Cinema going has turned into such a trite state that a film like this could be critically acclaimed and mass released.

In the day and age of no heart films, torture porn and saccharine dramas we again have to endure the waste of time, resources and column space that a films like this garners.

At a time when other worthwhile films slip into obscurity of small openings and DVD bargain bins. Looper commits the most atrocious of cinematic crimes it abuses the viewers trust in a way that even Von Trier would be embarrassed by in all his emotion manipulation.

Looper's first thirty minutes run by smoothly. It appears self-assured, paced confidently and even though the science and exposition is at best first grader and a worst lazy film- making we can forgive all of this and just go with it.

Taking in the sub-standard portrayal of the future with none of the background social commentary of other genre films.

Apart from some lazy shorthand referencing Doretha Lang's depression photograph of Mother With Seven Children replaced with future vagrant mother and child leaving behind any social cause and effect.

We feel we are getting to the meat of the story instead we find derivative shoot-outs, chases and uncompelling dialogue. At this point it all falls apart and the film runs into the dangerous space that modern cinema is not only touching on but beginning to permanently occupy.

The portrayal of females in the film is typical of the misogynistic movement in modern America's cinema.

Women are passive objects to be both lusted and tortured. In Lopper all the women portrayed are Whores or Junkies or have a perverse struggle with motherhood.

Emily Blunt's character is given a back-story from a daytime drama. She shown to have no motivation apart from giving into compulsion.

Any chance at positive female representation is at utter loss when she makes an-out-of nowhere unconvincing booty call with her child's adapted frog toy to Young Joe.

This scene is complete with ridiculously out of place romantic piano score. One gets the feeling the film-makers have misogynist issues that should have been worked out in therapy and not in celluloid.

Before all of this trite we get Bruce Willis's terrible act of killing a child an act in cinema that Hitchcock in his conversations with Truffaut remarked is a guaranteed way to lose an audience.

It has been done with a level of respect in films such as Afflecks Gone Baby Gone. In Looper it is unforgivable not only because of the act, but also in the way Johnson manipulates the audience and scenario for maximum effect making him parallel with pushers of Torture Porn.

We are asked to believe that a child straight off a Disney set walks into the wrong film and towards a pretty suburb home, which is unguarded, in this state of societal collapse and mass crime.

All this is for effect so when Old Joe shoots him we are more shocked, more horrified It is one of the more distasteful and undoubtedly manipulative scenes in recent cinema.

At the midway point the films personality splits, and it turns into a horror film about telekinetic abilities? In what seems like a pinned on sub-plot brought to the fore because they didn't know how to end the film.

The ending of self-sacrifice was a laughable attempt at catharsis. This infantile film should be laughed off the screens, especially given the sub-standard performances, Emily Blunts failure at acting in the miming smoking scene comes to mind,.

Critics drawing positive attention even with the quip that it entertains should be ashamed. The role of the critic should be to enlighten.

To shine a light towards the possibly unseen both within popular entertainment films and the unseen films that push the art form forwards.

Rollum 12 October The whole premise of this story was flawed from the beginning. For SciFi fans time travel is what its all about.

Its meant to be intriguing and full of conundrums that most importantly, some how make sense. All the best time travel movies have a consistency that holds the idea together.

This is precisely what Loopers does not have. There where so many holes in the plot that it became impossible to go with it. If your going to beam someone to the past to be killed why do you need a Looper.

And if you have to use a Looper why rely on him to kill himself - let someone else do it. Seriously this was just a few of the canyon like proportions of the gaps in the plot of this flop.

If Bruce was not in this i would have walked way before the end. I was fooled. You don't have to be. TheSquiss 25 September Time travel films open up all manner of questions because of the paradoxes every action and reaction produce.

Alas, to avoid dishing out hugely unpopular plot spoilers I need to skirt around the concerns, so you'll just have to come round with cake and we can discuss it in private.

But there are some pretty substantial issues with Looper that cause questions to be asked and lead to more than a couple of possible explanations as to what exactly is going on.

Don't see it alone; you'll need a friend around to discuss it on the journey home. Equally, don't be put off.

However, when a looper's contract is up, they find themselves blowing the brains out of their older self. Except when looper Joe Joseph Gordon-Levitt stares down the barrel at a version of himself that is thirty years older, Old Joe Bruce Willis outsmarts him and so begins a cat and mouse chase where there are multiples of each species and most of them aren't called Joe.

Don't think any more or you'll confound yourself with your wondering and wandering along all the possible flows and tributaries that lead from them. Like, Is he actually I'm sure you can work out from the subject matter that there are occasional murders so I'm giving nothing away by stating that a particular murder in cuts against the rules.

It's not a major problem in terms of enjoyment but it does cast a shadow over everything if minor errors are not avoided.

There's only one way to watch Looper: suspend all disbelief, put your logic in stasis and get on with enjoying the romp.

With that frame of mind employed, it's a superb film. No, it's not as intelligent a film as Inception, but it kicks the ass of Wanted and Gordon-Levitt is potentially a bigger star in the making than either Leonardo DiCaprio or James McAvoy.

I'm not sure that I buy Gordon-Levitt as a young Willis but the transition is simple and effectively executed and it needn't stand in the way of a couple of hours of great entertainment.

He's matured as an actor and, though he's been stamping around Hollywood for a good couple of decades, it's the last five years or so that have really seen him ascend the ranks and there's no sign of his climb slowing with both Spielberg's Lincoln and Don Jon's Addiction which he also wrote and directed in the can and Premium Rush earning plaudits on both sides of the Atlantic.

As for Willis, it's good to see him earning his fee again in a film worthy of his presence rather than phoning it in for a fat wad in the truly awful The Expendables 2.

Emily Blunt Sara and Jeff Daniels ably provide support, the former, sadly, barely stretched and the latter, as Abe, the loopers' boss, clearly enjoying himself.

Equally, Paul Dano gives a wonderful, trademark sniveling wretch performance that is all too brief. Unnerving is an understatement!

Clearly that wasn't the case with Maximum Overdrive Stephen King being the fine writer who should never be allowed either in front of or behind a camera again but with Looper it's a very strong case in point.

Johnson, though he bends his rules, has created a multi-layered, rapidly paced trip that is littered with bodies and to-die-for quips, to wit, "I cleaned you up.

And put a gun in your hand. Though he has nothing publicly on the slate, there'll be plenty more from him in the next few years.

As is increasingly the case, my biggest complaint with last night's viewing has nothing to do with the film itself but with the screening, namely the blown speakers all along one side of the auditorium big thumbs down to Cineworld and the moron in front who played with his phone and gave muted shrieks of excitement every time there was a shot or splatter of blood, even taking the time to relive it with his friend.

Who are these people? Why are they allowed to breathe? When will time travel come to my aid? Ah, but these are niggles and hopefully you won't be subjected to such when you watch Looper.

And do see it. Maybe you'll absolutely hate the confusion it causes you, but if you don't mind giving a film some real thought and you enjoyed the possibilities of Inception, then Looper is for you.

Just don't think too hard. No Spoilers will be shown, the story is basically the public knowledge shown on the trailers.

Basically his job is a looper. In the Year civilization has created time travel however it is highly illegal to use it. It is then controlled by the highest criminal mafia in the world.

In the future they cannot kill a person, so instead they send them back 30 years and the looper will kill them. When the young Joe saw the Old Joe standing there, he hesitated and the plot clashed.

The story was very confusing at first, but the movie does a good job to explain to us as it goes along. To be honest at first I thought this was going to be bad, the story took some time to build up, and the plot just didn't seem to have any structure.

Once the movie did pick up, boy did it pick up. It became intense as the hunter became the hunted. The story had emotion, action, we laughed and cried.

Many places where things appeared to be stupid ended actually be part of the story and working out. There are though, a lot of silly moments in the story that to my opinion could have been left out and the story would have been just as good.

The acting was very good. Also kinda shows how much Bruce Willis is getting old, but can still pack a punch. I give this movie an 8. FlixChatter 7 October As in the trailer, Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays Joe, a specialized assassin, in an outfit called the Loopers.

He lives in the year but the mob he works for lives 30 years ahead where time travel would've been invented. When his employer from the future wants to get rid of someone, they zap that person back 30 years where someone like Joe would be waiting with a big gun in hand, ready to blow them up to oblivion.

The only rule is: never let your target escape The job seems easy enough, I mean, the targets are blindfolded, so it's not like they could really escape.

That is, until one did, and that target happens to be his older self, in the form of Bruce Willis.

Now, before the action begins in full throttle, Director Rian Johnson sets up the story by introducing the Looper doing their jobs and how these junkies hit-men spend their lives in a dystopian future is there any other kind in the movies??

Let me just say the less you know about the plot the better as I went in pretty much 'blind,' other than seeing the trailer weeks ago, and it's fun to see the story unravel in ways I didn't really expect.

There's really a lot to chew on here, as do most time-travel movies, and I have to admit it was a bit mind-boggling to digest it all as I'm watching it, but now that I've processed the movie more, Johnson actually told the story well enough without an overly drawn-out exposition.

The strengths are in the performances, especially Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who seems to only get better and better as he grows to be a force to be reckoned with in Hollywood.

Seems like every time I see him, even in minor roles like in 'Inception' or 'The Dark Knight Rises,' he never fails to impress.

I've got to admit though, his prosthetic make-up to make him look like Bruce Willis is distracting at times, but once I get into the story, I got used to it.

In fact, in some scenes Gordon-Levitt's mannerism and expressions really do remind me of Willis! Now, I've always been a fan of Bruce.

He's a bad ass guy with a heart and I feel that he sold me on the emotional moments as well as on the action front, in which he channels his iconic John McClane in the 'Die Hard' franchise.

In fact, I kept waiting for him to yell 'Yiippiikayee' during some of the shootout scenes! I'm also impressed with Emily Blunt and child actor Pierce Gagnon who plays her little boy.

Both played two key roles that serve as the emotional center of the story. Their paths crossed with both the younger and older Joe in a way that not only affect their own lives but the lives of Joe's fellow Loopers.

Their scenes with Gordon-Levitt are well-played, though it could perhaps be tightened a bit as it does feel dragging at times.

Jeff Daniels and Paul Dano also lend memorable supporting performances, Daniels is sort of a comic relief as Joe's manager who happens to be sent by the mob from the future.

It's refreshing to see a movie based on an original script, not an adaptation nor a remake. Despite all the time travel elements, the film also doesn't feel too science-fiction-y.

I'm also glad Johnson doesn't pile on one action set pieces after another, instead there are a lot of quiet moments to establish character development that help you get immersed in Joe's journey.

Final Thoughts: Looper is a thrill ride that has a nice blend of thrilling action and matters of the heart.

There are brutal action and some totally-unnecessary nudity here, but fortunately not so much so that derails my overall appreciation for it.

At the core of this movie lies a heartfelt love story between a man and a woman, and also between a mother and his son.

Highly recommended. Stir a little H. Wells in with some Stephen King and add a pinch of "The Sopranos," and you've got the basics of "Brick" director Rian Johnson's contrived, unconvincing chronicle.

Bruce Willis and Joseph Gordon-Levitt are cast as one in the same character in this disappointing actioneer that pits them against each other with a no-win outcome.

Furthermore, both protagonists emerge as more anti-heroic than heroic. If you dismiss the fact these talented thespians bear scant resemblance to each other, you must still consider the scarcity of information about a distant future as well as a warped premise.

These shortcomings constitute the chief flaws in this imaginative but predictable sci-fi saga that unfolds in an erratic manner, lacks quotable dialogue, and features one character with no qualms about shooting innocent adolescents.

By the time this uninspired, R-rated, minute, spectacle has worn out its welcome; you have no reason to care about anybody, including an obnoxious telekinetic tyke who doesn't know when to keep his trap shut.

Mind you, the future has never appeared more dystopian. Some people are born with a mutation that enables them to levitate objects, and these fellows find that they can lure facile-minded babes into bed by making quarters float above the palms of their hands.

The economy has hit bottom, and vagrancy has become epidemic. Citizens can execute vagrants on the spot if they feel so inclined. Any time Hollywood undertakes a time travel tale, the filmmakers conjure up some of the ugliest vehicles.

While the cars and trucks look hopelessly tacky, the motorcycles resemble something Luke Skywalker might ride. Basically, you see a guy straddling a cylinder with handle bars.

Computer-generated special effects blur everything beneath his feet so he appears to be cruising on a cushion of air. Johnson's screenplay is as amoral as his narrative premise is warped.

Imitating the best Mafia movies of director Martin Scorsese, Johnson relies on the voice-over narration of his lead character to acquaint us not only with his unusual profession but also with the seedy world in which he thrives.

Kansas in the year serves as the setting. Presumably, Johnson is making an ironic "Wizard of Oz" joke with his futuristic fable.

The premise of "Looper" is that a guy can live the high life by killing individuals from the future who have been sent back to the past.

Actually, Abe was beamed back from the future to coordinate the equivalent of Murder Incorporated. In the s, the Mafia relied on out-of-town gunmen from to ice enemies on their own turf.

For example, if the New York Mafia wanted to dispose of an adversary, they contracted a Chicago gunsel to eliminate him.

The rationale was that the authorities always sought a motive. What motive would a Chicago mobster have for killing New York mobster that he didn't know?

This remained standard operating procedure until the authorities figured out the connection. Mobsters in the year cannot murder their adversaries because humans have become too easy to track.

Since the mob cannot kill their own, they contract hits out to mobsters from the past. Gunman designated 'loopers' kill and dispose of these victims that the mob has beamed back so nobody can find them.

Our hero wields an exotic shotgun called a 'blunderbuss,' and the looper waits near a cornfield in the middle of nowhere with his weapon and a tarp spread on the ground.

Eventually, a bound man with a bag over his head and silver ingots strapped to his back materializes. After he murders his prey, Joseph incinerates him so no traces remain.

When a gangland assassin in the future has worn out his welcome, however, the mob sends him back to the past so he can kill himself.

They call this 'closing the loop. Losing one's older self is referred to as 'letting his loop run. Older Joe has been given a map with three possible addresses for this 'Rainmaker.

Looper Imdb IMDb-History: Looper. IMDb-History • Datenstand • Filmliste. Diese Seite listet alte Platzierungen des Films Looper in der TopListe der Internet Movie. Zeitreise mit jeder Menge Knarren: In Looper wird viel und scharf geschossen. Anzeige Die Top-Movies des IMDb-Rankings im Stream. Action Type Filme Ursprünglicher ist Name Looper. Gemerkt von stopbingedrinking.eu Looper HD Stream Deutsch Zusehen The Last Stand () - IMDb. Directed.

Looper Imdb Navigation menu Video

Jungle Jail - ESMA 2007 Die Amazon-Angebote bieten jeden Tag Schnäppchen. Vereinigte StaatenVolksrepublik Tucker And Dale Vs Evil Stream German [1] [2]. In: synchronkartei. Oktober Mehr zum Thema. Aktuelle Gutscheine, Angebote und Rabatte. Januar In: 34th Annual Young Artist Awards. Looper Imdb

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Kommentare

  1. Tojalrajas

    Ist Einverstanden, es ist der ausgezeichnete Gedanke

  2. Fenrizahn

    Wacker, dieser Gedanke fällt gerade übrigens

  3. Tauramar

    Welche interessante Frage

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.